The article analyses the decision that the Italian Competition Authority issued in the Leadiant case in 2022. The pharmaceutical company, according to the Authority’s claim, had implemented a complex strategy over several years that resulted in the excessive price increase of one of its drugs. For the first time, a company in the pharmaceutical market was sanctioned for abusing its dominant position in relation to an orphan drug. The case is one of many in a new wave of excessive pricing cases. The renewed scrutiny is reviving attention for this type of antitrust infringement contrary to Article 102 (a) TFEU, which until recently had limited application. The reconstruction of the factual circumstances is complemented by notes on the regulation of the pharmaceutical market in Europe.
Il presente contributo analizza la decisione che l’Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato ha reso nel caso Leadiant nel 2022. La società farmaceutica, secondo quanto sostenuto dall’Autorità, avrebbe attuato un’articolata strategia protrattasi per diversi anni che ha avuto come esito l’aumento eccessivo del prezzo di un suo farmaco. Per la prima volta è stata sanzionata una società nel mercato farmaceutico per abuso di posizione dominante in relazione ad un farmaco orfano. Il caso si inserisce in un nuovo filone di casi di prezzi ingiustificatamente gravosi che sembrerebbe riaccendere l’attenzione per questo tipo di illecito antitrust contrario all’art. 102, lett a) del TFUE che ha sempre avuto applicazione residuale. Alla ricostruzione delle circostanze fattuali si accompagnano note sulla regolamentazione del mercato farmaceutico in Europa.
I prezzi ingiustificatamente gravosi nel settore farmaceutico: il caso Leadiant (Italia)
Francesca De Luca
2025-01-01
Abstract
The article analyses the decision that the Italian Competition Authority issued in the Leadiant case in 2022. The pharmaceutical company, according to the Authority’s claim, had implemented a complex strategy over several years that resulted in the excessive price increase of one of its drugs. For the first time, a company in the pharmaceutical market was sanctioned for abusing its dominant position in relation to an orphan drug. The case is one of many in a new wave of excessive pricing cases. The renewed scrutiny is reviving attention for this type of antitrust infringement contrary to Article 102 (a) TFEU, which until recently had limited application. The reconstruction of the factual circumstances is complemented by notes on the regulation of the pharmaceutical market in Europe.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


