In the Demirkan ruling, the Court of Justice of the European Union refused to extend the passive freedom of services first stated in the Luisi e Carbone ruling to Turkish tourists wishing to enter a member State of the EU without obtaining a visa. The Case Note reviews the grounds of this finding, which partially reiterate those at the basis of the Ziebell ruling as regards the different purposes of the Association between Turkey and the EU, on the one hand, and the Treaty on the European Union, on the other hand. Nevertheless, doubts are raised on the importance that the Court and the Advocate General in Demirkan attach to the link between the passive freedom of services and the concept of European citizenship. Ultimately, the impact of the ruling on the negotiation between Turkey and the EU on visa liberalization is highlighted.
L’ingresso dei cittadini turchi nell’UE al tempo della sentenza Demirkan
PISTOIA, Emanuela
2014-01-01
Abstract
In the Demirkan ruling, the Court of Justice of the European Union refused to extend the passive freedom of services first stated in the Luisi e Carbone ruling to Turkish tourists wishing to enter a member State of the EU without obtaining a visa. The Case Note reviews the grounds of this finding, which partially reiterate those at the basis of the Ziebell ruling as regards the different purposes of the Association between Turkey and the EU, on the one hand, and the Treaty on the European Union, on the other hand. Nevertheless, doubts are raised on the importance that the Court and the Advocate General in Demirkan attach to the link between the passive freedom of services and the concept of European citizenship. Ultimately, the impact of the ruling on the negotiation between Turkey and the EU on visa liberalization is highlighted.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
