INTRODUCTION Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are an effective alternative for Teno-regeneration [1]. Despite their applications in tendon engineering, the mechanisms promoting tendon healing still need to be understood. Since there is scattered information on ovine ADSCs, this research aims to investigate in vitro their teno-differentiation for potential use in preclinical tendon regeneration models. METHODS Ovine ADSCs were isolated from the tail region according to FAT-STEM laboratories [2], expanded until passage six (P6), and characterized in terms of stemness, adhesion and MHC markers by Flow Cytometry (FCM) and immunocytochemistry (ICC). Cell proliferation and senescence were evaluated with MTT and Beta-galactosidase assays, respectively. P1 ADSCs’ teno-differentiation was assessed by culturing them with teno-inductive Conditioned Media (CM) or engineering them on tendon-mimetic PLGA scaffolds [3,4]. ADSCs teno-differentiation was evaluated by morphological, molecular (qRT-PCR), and biochemical (WesternBlot) approaches. RESULTS ADSCs exhibited mesenchymal phenotype, positive for stemness (SOX2, NANOG, OCT4), adhesion (CD29, CD44, CD90, CD166) and MHC-I markers, while negative for hematopoietic (CD31, CD45) and MHC-II markers, showing no difference between passages. ICC staining confirmed these results, where ADSCs showed nuclear positivity for SOX2 (≅ 56%) and NANOG (≅ 67%), with high proliferation capacity without senescence until P6. Interestingly, ADSCs cultured with the teno-inductive CM did not express tenomodulin (TNMD) protein or gene. Conversely, ADSCs seeded on scaffolds teno-differentiated, acquiring a spindle shape supported by TNMD protein expression at 48h (p<0.05 vs. ADSCs 48h) with a significant increase at 14 days of culture (p<0.05 vs. ADSCs + fleece 48h). DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS Ovine ADSCs respond differently upon distinct teno-inductive strategies. While the molecules on the CM could not trigger a teno-differentiation in the cells, the scaffold’s topological stimulus did, resulting in the best strategy to apply. More insights are requested to better understand ovine ADSCs’ tenogenic commitment before using them in vivo for tendon regeneration.
Novel stem cell strategies for tendon regeneration
Arlette Alina Haidar Montes;Annunziata Mauro;Adrian Cervero-Varona;Giuseppe Prencipe;Mohammad El Khatib;Umberto Tosi;Valentina Russo;Barbara Barboni
2023-01-01
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are an effective alternative for Teno-regeneration [1]. Despite their applications in tendon engineering, the mechanisms promoting tendon healing still need to be understood. Since there is scattered information on ovine ADSCs, this research aims to investigate in vitro their teno-differentiation for potential use in preclinical tendon regeneration models. METHODS Ovine ADSCs were isolated from the tail region according to FAT-STEM laboratories [2], expanded until passage six (P6), and characterized in terms of stemness, adhesion and MHC markers by Flow Cytometry (FCM) and immunocytochemistry (ICC). Cell proliferation and senescence were evaluated with MTT and Beta-galactosidase assays, respectively. P1 ADSCs’ teno-differentiation was assessed by culturing them with teno-inductive Conditioned Media (CM) or engineering them on tendon-mimetic PLGA scaffolds [3,4]. ADSCs teno-differentiation was evaluated by morphological, molecular (qRT-PCR), and biochemical (WesternBlot) approaches. RESULTS ADSCs exhibited mesenchymal phenotype, positive for stemness (SOX2, NANOG, OCT4), adhesion (CD29, CD44, CD90, CD166) and MHC-I markers, while negative for hematopoietic (CD31, CD45) and MHC-II markers, showing no difference between passages. ICC staining confirmed these results, where ADSCs showed nuclear positivity for SOX2 (≅ 56%) and NANOG (≅ 67%), with high proliferation capacity without senescence until P6. Interestingly, ADSCs cultured with the teno-inductive CM did not express tenomodulin (TNMD) protein or gene. Conversely, ADSCs seeded on scaffolds teno-differentiated, acquiring a spindle shape supported by TNMD protein expression at 48h (p<0.05 vs. ADSCs 48h) with a significant increase at 14 days of culture (p<0.05 vs. ADSCs + fleece 48h). DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS Ovine ADSCs respond differently upon distinct teno-inductive strategies. While the molecules on the CM could not trigger a teno-differentiation in the cells, the scaffold’s topological stimulus did, resulting in the best strategy to apply. More insights are requested to better understand ovine ADSCs’ tenogenic commitment before using them in vivo for tendon regeneration.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
