With the onset of the pandemic, the confrontation between the State and the regions has intensified, precisely because of the excessive restrictions adopted at state level. The judgment n. 37 of 2021 is perhaps the tip of the iceberg of this contrast, in which attempts to adopt legislation different from that approved at national level leads the Court to reconsider the limit of international prophylaxis provided for by art. 117, paragraph 2, lett. q), Cost., and to consider it applicable to the case in question, but without resolving other issues that perhaps deserve more attention.

Pandemia e riparto delle competenze Stato-Regioni in periodi emergenziali

Massimiliano Mezzanotte
2021-01-01

Abstract

With the onset of the pandemic, the confrontation between the State and the regions has intensified, precisely because of the excessive restrictions adopted at state level. The judgment n. 37 of 2021 is perhaps the tip of the iceberg of this contrast, in which attempts to adopt legislation different from that approved at national level leads the Court to reconsider the limit of international prophylaxis provided for by art. 117, paragraph 2, lett. q), Cost., and to consider it applicable to the case in question, but without resolving other issues that perhaps deserve more attention.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11575/120096
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact