The paper aims to demostrate a change in the jurisprudential interpretation of the rules of the XII tables about the killing of the thief. In archaic law, the self-defense was allowed on the objective basis of a theft committed during the night, or during the day by an armed thief. The influence of the lex Aquilia, and particularly of the subjective idea of iniuria – identified with dolus or culpa – led the jurists to admit the self-defense only when the victim subjectively felt an imminent danger.
|Titolo:||L’uccisione del fur nocturnus e diurnus qui se telo defendit tra norma e interpretatio|
|Autori interni:||CURSI, MARIA FLORIANA|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2016|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||2.1 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio)|