The scholarly debate has often criticized the traditional distinction between foedera aequa and foedera iniqua, because of the absence of this terminology in the Roman sources, being the second category a creation of their interpretation by Grotius. However, the study of the Roman international relationships clarifies that a simply terminological analysis of the different types of foedera doesn’t make justice of the complexity of the phenomenon, and that a true picture can be obtained only taking into account the political and military power of Rome and its effects in the standardization of international relationships.[...]
Titolo: | Il carattere paradigmatico della classificazione dei ‘foedera’: dalla partizione di Livio alla sistematica di Grozio, in L. LABRUNA (dir.), Tradizione romanistica e Costituzione, II, Collana ‘Cinquanta anni della Corte costituzionale della Repubblica italiana’, Napoli, 2006, 1561-1585 |
Autori: | |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2006 |
Abstract: | The scholarly debate has often criticized the traditional distinction between foedera aequa and foedera iniqua, because of the absence of this terminology in the Roman sources, being the second category a creation of their interpretation by Grotius. However, the study of the Roman international relationships clarifies that a simply terminological analysis of the different types of foedera doesn’t make justice of the complexity of the phenomenon, and that a true picture can be obtained only taking into account the political and military power of Rome and its effects in the standardization of international relationships.[...] |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11575/12549 |
ISBN: | 8849512481 |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 2.1 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio) |